Most of these black conquistadors were born in Africa, but they typically
reached the American mainland after spending time in the Caribbean
colonies, and sometimes also in Spain or Portugal. Most were slaves when
they began fighting, but as conquistadors sooner or later won their freedom.
A minority were Iberian-born and a minority were free men before
their conquest experience.
Juan García and Miguel Ruíz, Spanish-born free mulattos who fought in Peru , were at the far end of the spectrum in both these respects; Ruíz, who (like Antonio Pérez in
Venezuela) participated as a horseman rather than a footman, was the closest
to being a Spaniard in terms of status and treatment.
|
Most Blacks were young men when they joined conquest expeditions, but
not youths, and not without some experience of the world; thirty seems tohave been a typical age of a black conquistador at the start of his first campaign.
This would have put him very slightly older than his Spanish counterpart—
judging from the ages of 107 of the conquistadors at Cajamarca,
two-thirds of whom were in their twenties (mostly late-twenties) and a quarterin their thirties and from the ages of the Spanish conquerors of New Granada, whose average age was twenty-seven.
The Spanish distrust of
less Hispanized Blacks must in part account for the paucity of very young
African men playing armed roles in the Conquest;
it is also probable that
younger unacculturated Africans (or “bozales”) were more likely to be
placed in danger by Spaniards—used as “arrow fodder,” as it were—and
thus less likely to survive and enter the historical record.
The high incidence of “Juan” as a black conquistador Christian name is
worth comment. Of a dozen black conquistadors whose names are recorded
seven were named “Juan.”
This was more than mere coincidence, but it did not reflect a pattern particularto Blacks under arms or to Spanish American Blacks in general; “Juan”was simply the most common male Christian name in the Spanish-speakingworld in the sixteenth century.
A comparison of names given to Spanish and
black infants in the 1540s and ’50s, the former in Mexico City and the latterin nearby Puebla, showed that “Juan” was the name of choice, assigned toabout a quarter of baptized boys in both groups |
The valiant captain Juan Beltrán, a mulatto, son of a black man and an Indian woman, is worthy of eternal memory for his great deeds among the Indians...
. He was very deferential toward the Spaniards, and very obedient and loyal to them.
With the Indians he was fearless; they stood in awe of him and respected him, to such a degree that the mere mention of his name was often enough to intimidate the Indians and put their forces to flight.
The Spaniards
on several occasions,seeing themselves hard put to it, gave out that CaptainJuan Beltrán was coming to them, and thus they gained the victory; such authority did he have with them, and such respect and fear did they show him.
Accordingly for his sterling character and his bravery, Governor MartínGarcía de Loyola, in His Majesty’s name, presented him with 500 Indians and
gave him the title of Infantry Captain. He was a valiant governor and captainfor them. With his 500 Indians he built his fort two leagues from Villarica, and they were very obedient to him.
He made himself respected and feared in allthe neighboring provinces, into which he made long malocas or raids, bringing back great prizes. So long as he lived, Villarica was well defended and could rely on his aid and protection, until they finally killed him.
His loss wasthe end of the Spaniards, and they perished at the hands of the Indians. Merely to write his victories and heroic deeds against the Indians in His Majesty’s service and in defense of the Spaniards, would require an entire volume.
Despite the mythologizing tone of this account, this kind of warrior reputation was broadly associated with black conquistadors to an extent that suggests a consistent Spanish witnessing of African military prowess in the194 BLACK CONQUISTADORS |
|